Showing posts with label English football TV deal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label English football TV deal. Show all posts

Monday, June 25, 2012

A sporting economy?

Money. It's changed football. It's in the process of ruining one of Scotland's biggest clubs. Our sport has both a complex relationship with cash and an insatiable desire for more dosh. It's not always a healthy relationship.

Maybe we should ask not what money can do for sport but what sport can do for the economy. Guest blogger Drew Griffiths has done just that:

With record levels of unemployment, an record breaking recession and the general deterioration of moral within the UK; will this summer’s sporting events give us Brits anything  to smile about?

Looking at things objectively, what we need is a boost to the economy if possible (although being entertained by world class athletes is also nice). Can sport play its part in helping dig the UK, or any other European country, out of this proverbial economic hole?

Holding a major sporting event is a chance for the host country to enhance its ‘brand’. The most obvious advantage of being a host city (or country), is the boost in tourism. Immediately - during the event and potentially for years afterwards.  This is usually the case, but does depend on what kind of image the host city manages to portray to the rest of the world. If for example, there was a huge security breach or act of terrorism during an event it is unlikely that people will want to visit with their families the following summer.

The impact on tourism will also depend on the baseline tourism statistics for the host.  During the 1998 World Cup in France, several financial experts suggested that the World Cup had very little impact on tourism.  People who would normally visit for the traditional French attractions such as wine, art or culture stayed away because of the football, and the football fans.  The Rugby World Cup in 2011, increased New Zealand's revenue from tourism by 3% whilst the FIFA World Cup in South Africa had a much larger impact on tourism statistics but also highlighted another dimension of economic consequences – immigration.

Official reports state that the 2010 World Cup had 400,000 visitors from abroad, however the official ticket sales did not correlate with this increase in tourism.  It has not been estimated (from what I could find) how many illegal migrants remained in the country after the tournament.

On a more positive note sporting events also help to improve mood and morale in the work place; if the national team win at least!  Research does in fact conclude that of winning teams or athletes can improve self-esteem via association.  That’s great but what about the real financial boost that sport provides?

Looking at some statistics; according to Sport England:
The sport economy’s annual contribution has reached £16.668 billion - up 140% in real terms between 1985 and 2008.
In a 2010 report Sport England also found that the number of people in sports related jobs has also grown to 441,000, representing nearly 2% of all employment in England and only 13% of the 441,000 work in the public sector. 

England’s national sport of football, has also been in the news recently with the Premier League selling TV rights for £3 billion.   According to a report by The Guardian, this equates to at least £14 million more per year for each football club, with each televised match now costing £6.6 million.

This could have several consequences.  Firstly the player’s wages are likely to increase. Disgusting I know, but just think about the extra super-tax they’ll be paying.  However with many teams making losses in recent years and, of course, the continued fallout from the financial crisis at Rangers, it is hoped that the money will be invested in sustainable growth in terms of player talent development and also creating a profitable business structure for the clubs.  This could in turn help local economies with employing more staff and even looking to further develop their brand on a global scale.

Sport will always be embedded in the economy, as it is with other sociological spheres such as politics.  Hopefully this summer’s sporting events will be successful and help boost the UK’s economy and sense of national pride.

Drew Griffiths has a 1st Class Honours Degree in Sport Science from Loughborough University and a Master’s Degree in Exercise & Nutrition from Liverpool University. He currently works for MoneySupermarket.com as a writer and an SEO Associate.

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

England: 20 years of riches

It's 20 years now since football started.

That seems to be the unspoken claim amid the marketing hype marking two decades of the English Premier League and TV revolution ushered in by Rupert Murdoch's Sky.

While the English top flight celebrates like history never existed before 1992, our own game is down in the dumps, mired in debt, penury and recrimination.

So here's a timely infographic looking at turnover, debt and income in the English Premier League.

Interesting stuff.


Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Can Liverpool Lead Celtic and Rangers To TV Riches?

Football's television money will forever turn heads.

The Guardian reports that:

"The deal that shares television's billions equally between Premier League clubs is facing its biggest threat to date after Liverpool announced they would lead a challenge for overseas TV rights to be sold on a club-by-club basis." (www.guardian.co.uk)

A debate, Liverpool's men in suits say, that needs to happen.

For any doubters this is proof that the game's elite hardly saw the recent court ruling on the cross border availability of satellite TV coverage as a Robin Hood-esque win for the downtrodden poor over the nasty rich.

It's no surprise that top English clubs, whose gods are all financial, want to maximise their profits while raising the drawbridge on competition.

Does it mean anything for Scotland?

It could.

I'd be amazed if this issue wasn't being closely tracked in the boardrooms of Ibrox and Celtic Park.

I've written before about Ajax's desire to break free from their league's collective Eredivisie Live TV channel and market their own rights separately.

They argue that the television riches of the modern game's biggest leagues have robbed them of their elite status and only by jettisoning any sense of duty to the rest of the Dutch league can they hope to clamber back to the top table.

Celtic and Rangers will gauge, correctly, that they are the only real overseas draw the SPL have.

They would also fancy being freed from a collective deal at home. They'll know exactly how many viewers they draw to the SPL coverage on Sky and ESPN. Without seeing the figures I'd guess that the average audience of around 160,000 across 60 live games would be much smaller if the Old Firm were removed from the equation.

If the concept of these existing collective deals begins to shatter across Europe Celtic and Rangers will have the precedent they need to agitate for their own breakaway.

The onus on the SPL to get their next television deal right would seem to have become ever more important.

A refreshing wind of opportunity might just have blown through Glasgow.

There's likely to be a storm of foreboding gathering over every other SPL club.

Donate to the Scottish Football Blog Blogathon, 19 November 2011